[RFA] Top-level configure.in needs AC_PREREQ
Dan Kegel
dank@kegel.com
Wed Jan 8 18:05:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Jan 8 18:05:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA] Top-level configure.in needs AC_PREREQ
- Next message (by thread): HELP me unsubscribe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Faylor wrote: > I think the minimal autoconf version needed for the new autoconfiscated > configure.in is 2.13, correct? If so, I think an AC_PREREQ is called > for, if for no other reason than to be consistent with gcc, gdb, > binutils. winsup, etc. > ... > RCS file: /cvs/uberbaum/configure.in,v > ... > AC_INIT(move-if-change) > +AC_PREREQ(2.13) Yes, please. All configure.in's should have AC_PREREQ. It makes life much easier when you compile gcc and friends under both cygwin and debian, as we do. - Dan -- Dan Kegel Linux User #78045 http://www.kegel.com
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA] Top-level configure.in needs AC_PREREQ
- Next message (by thread): HELP me unsubscribe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list