relax jalr $t9 [R_MIPS_JALR symbol] to bal symbol
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Tue Mar 25 23:35:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Mar 25 23:35:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): relax jalr $t9 [R_MIPS_JALR symbol] to bal symbol
- Next message (by thread): relax jalr $t9 [R_MIPS_JALR symbol] to bal symbol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 25, 2003, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote: > I can't imagine implementations are intelligent enough to detect > this special case in their branch prediction so branches may > occasionally be misspredicted. I'd think they should. Gee, it's a special register, after all! Anyway, we could the `likely' version of this instruction, if we find that the next instruction is a nop. Heck we could even try to copy the instruction from the branch target and branch to the next instruction instead, as long as it's not a branch itself. It's just a matter of programming :-) > So I'd say go for the bal thing. Yeah, one step at a time. I just need approval from the MIPS maintainer now. Hmm... I *think* Eric had pre-approved this. Eric, can you confirm? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
- Previous message (by thread): relax jalr $t9 [R_MIPS_JALR symbol] to bal symbol
- Next message (by thread): relax jalr $t9 [R_MIPS_JALR symbol] to bal symbol
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list