bug-binutils@gnu.org
J. Grant
jg-lists@jguk.org
Sat Nov 1 20:42:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sat Nov 1 20:42:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): bug-binutils@gnu.org
- Next message (by thread): bug-binutils@gnu.org
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Nick, The problem I encountered, which prompted me to inquire about bug-binutils@gnu.org address was the fact that my post did not even get through to whatever bug-binutils@gnu.org presently forwards too. It bounced straight back to me (well rather slowly, but still faster than traditional post :). A little ironic considering the amount of SPAM that unfortunately gets on some gnu lists. Your patch looks great. IMO if bug-binutils@gnu.org could forward directly to binutils@sourceware.org I think that would be great. Better than going unread as I presently found. Regards JG on the 31/10/03 09:11, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi J.G, > >> My cvs build from a few days ago has bug-binutils@gnu.org listed as >> the bug reporting address. If bug-binutils@gnu.org is no longer the >> working contact address listed for the tools, could a change to the >> replacement address be made? > > This is a delicate issue, because the FSF insists that the > bug-binutils address be the official bug reporting address. Which is > reasonable, given that this is an FSF project. The address does work - > it is just that the amount of spam in it means that very few people > read it, and so most of the development work is being carried out on > the sourceware list. > > I think that a patch like the one below might be acceptable, but we > will have to check with the FSF to make sure. > > Cheers > Nick
- Previous message (by thread): bug-binutils@gnu.org
- Next message (by thread): bug-binutils@gnu.org
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list