A gdb+bfd string pool?
Joel Brobecker
brobecker@gnat.com
Tue Nov 4 08:16:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Nov 4 08:16:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): A gdb+bfd string pool?
- Next message (by thread): A gdb+bfd string pool?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Personally, I'd be against this unless we have reason to believe that > it's an important optimization. I don't like global data in general, > even if it's only global to one component of a program, and having > that data shared by both GDB and BFD makes me even more nervous. > (Singleton is not my favorite design pattern.) So it sets of warning > bells for general design reasons; our lack of const-correctness when > dealing with names makes me even more nervous. I have the exact same feeling. May I recommend that, should we decide to use one, we isolate it from GDB's code via a layer. So each module would use it's layer as if it was not shared. It will make the move back easier, in case it's ever needed. -- Joel
- Previous message (by thread): A gdb+bfd string pool?
- Next message (by thread): A gdb+bfd string pool?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list