[BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Thu Nov 13 22:21:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Nov 13 22:21:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- Next message (by thread): [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:16:14 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:12:40PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote: >> But Jason Merrill says >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00682.html >> >> "I don't see why there would be a problem with the current >> situation; only the right .debug_line info should match the current PC." >> >> and in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00689.html >> >> "... the relocs in the .debug_line info for the discarded copy should >> resolve to 0. That's how we deal with duplicate .debug_info ..." >> >> And then he came with the test case >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-10/msg00723.html >> to show how that works - and it turned out not to work anymore >> with binutils-2.14.90. >> >> Is there any reason why this can't be changed back? > > Have you tried this using CVS binutils? > > Nick could not reproduce your problem. It could be a patch in Rawhide, > unlikely as that seems. IIRC, I reproduced the bug with CVS binutils (of a month ago). Jason
- Previous message (by thread): [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- Next message (by thread): [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list