Readelf vs objdump
Stan Shebs
shebs@apple.com
Wed Nov 19 01:22:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Nov 19 01:22:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] tc-h8300.c: Remove an unused struct.
- Next message (by thread): Readelf vs objdump
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
So, fresh from the stunning success of Panther, and scanning the horizon for new prey to consu^Wassim^Wadopt :-) , we've been looking a bit at the prospects for moving from stabs to dwarf2 debugging. It's not too hard to tweak Darwin GDB and GCC to get something minimal working using Mach-O object files, but in order to scale up and improve performance, we could really use a dwarf dumper, such as the one in readelf. While it seems like an obvious thing to hack up the dwarf dumping code so that it can be used in objdump for non-ELF, it makes me wonder why there is a separate readelf program in the first place. Is this just historical, or is there a fundamental reason why binutils has two file dumpers? (I understand that the details of functionality are different, but that's not a fundamental reason to have two.) Stan
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] tc-h8300.c: Remove an unused struct.
- Next message (by thread): Readelf vs objdump
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list