ld (bfd?) bug: unmatched excluded include in stabs
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Tue Nov 25 12:00:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Nov 25 12:00:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): ld (bfd?) bug: unmatched excluded include in stabs
- Next message (by thread): [dejagnu] Print KFAILS in dejagnu summary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Mattias,
> Here is the proposed patch, which seems to cure it:
>
> --- binutils-031118/bfd/stabs.c~ Tue Nov 4 12:30:54 2003
> +++ binutils-031118/bfd/stabs.c Tue Nov 18 16:24:01 2003
> @@ -358,6 +358,8 @@
> incl_type = incl_sym[TYPEOFF];
> if (incl_type == 0)
> break;
> + else if (incl_type == (int) N_EXCL)
> + continue;
> else if (incl_type == (int) N_EINCL)
> {
> if (nest == 0)
Thanks very much. This patch is quite reasonable, so I have applied
it together with this ChangeLog entry:
2003-11-25 Mattias Engdegard <mattias@virtutech.se>
* stabs.c (_bfd_link_section_stabs): Skip N_EXCL stabs when
processing N_BINCL stabs.
Cheers
Nick
- Previous message (by thread): ld (bfd?) bug: unmatched excluded include in stabs
- Next message (by thread): [dejagnu] Print KFAILS in dejagnu summary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list