Results for binutils 2.14.90 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Christian Joensson
christian@j-son.org
Tue Oct 7 12:15:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Oct 7 12:15:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Results for binutils 2.14.90 20031007 testsuite on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
- Next message (by thread): Results for binutils 2.14.90 20031007 testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aurora SPARC Linux 1.0 (Ansel) SS20 dual SuperSparc-(II) sun4m: binutils-2.14.90 20031006 sparc-linux bison-1.35-1 dejagnu-1.4.2-10 (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS) expect-5.32.2-67 gcc-2.96-113 glibc-2.2.5-43sparc.1 glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.9sparc (ftp://auroralinux.org/pub/aurora/corona/RPMS) kernel-smp-2.4.20-2.31sparc tcl-8.3.3-67 LAST_UPDATED: Tue Oct 7 09:19:17 UTC 2003 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === binutils tests === Running target unix/-fPIC === binutils Summary for unix/-fPIC === # of expected passes 31 # of untested testcases 1 Running target unix === binutils Summary for unix === # of expected passes 31 # of untested testcases 1 === binutils Summary === # of expected passes 62 # of untested testcases 2 === gas tests === Running target unix/-fPIC === gas Summary for unix/-fPIC === # of expected passes 65 Running target unix === gas Summary for unix === # of expected passes 65 === gas Summary === # of expected passes 130 === ld tests === Running target unix/-fPIC FAIL: ELF weak func first DSO FAIL: ELF weak func last DSO FAIL: ELF weak data first DSO FAIL: ELF weak data last DSO FAIL: ELF weak data first DSO common FAIL: ELF weak data last DSO common FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 1 FAIL: S-records FAIL: S-records with constructors === ld Summary for unix/-fPIC === # of expected passes 180 # of unexpected failures 9 # of expected failures 2 Running target unix FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC, load offset) FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so) FAIL: ELF weak func first DSO FAIL: ELF weak func last DSO FAIL: ELF weak data first DSO FAIL: ELF weak data last DSO FAIL: ELF weak data first DSO common FAIL: ELF weak data last DSO common === ld Summary for unix === # of expected passes 177 # of unexpected failures 12 # of expected failures 2 === ld Summary === # of expected passes 357 # of unexpected failures 21 # of expected failures 4 version: binutils 2.14.90 Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu configure flags: --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-binutils --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix Counting all warnings, there are 42 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap. Number of warnings per file: 16 include/linux/sysctl.h 10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c 10 libiberty/regex.c 4 libiberty/floatformat.c 1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/objdump.c 1 lex.yy.c Number of warning types: 16 comma at end of enumerator list 10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???' 8 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression 6 unused parameter \`???' 1 passing arg ??? of \`???' from incompatible pointer type 1 \`???' defined but not used
- Previous message (by thread): Results for binutils 2.14.90 20031007 testsuite on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
- Next message (by thread): Results for binutils 2.14.90 20031007 testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list