(Fwd) wrong expected section attributes for .interp
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Mon Oct 20 16:12:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Oct 20 16:12:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): Bug in objcopy
- Next message (by thread): (Fwd) wrong expected section attributes for .interp
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Send me a complete testcase. I will fix it. H.J. On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 12:28:55PM +0200, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote: > hello, > > i'm not sure if you read this mail, i'm resending it in just in case. > > ------- Forwarded message follows ------- > From: Self <pageexec@freemail.hu> > To: hjl@gnu.org > Subject: wrong expected section attributes for .interp > Copies to: pappy@gentoo.org, solar@gentoo.org > Send reply to: pageexec@freemail.hu > Date sent: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:54:26 +0200 > > hello, > > while working on Hardened Gentoo and position independent > executable support we ran into an apparent bug in bfd. > here: > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf.c?rev=1.192&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src > > you committed a change that defines expected section > attributes for a select set of hardcoded section names. > the bug we found is the .interp entry which should have > SHF_ALLOC instead of 0, otherwise you will either get > a warning (if you compile glibc which produces an .interp > section from C and marks it with "a") or an invalid output > (when you produce the .interp from assembly and don't mark > it allocatable) because the resulting executable will not > have a PT_INTERP segment. so the fix is easy and we would > appreciate if it went into bfd/binutils before 2.15 ships. > > thanks in advance, > > PaX Team > ------- End of forwarded message -------
- Previous message (by thread): Bug in objcopy
- Next message (by thread): (Fwd) wrong expected section attributes for .interp
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list