m68k reloc types
Roman Zippel
zippel@linux-m68k.org
Mon Aug 16 22:21:00 GMT 2004
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Aug 16 22:21:00 GMT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): m68k reloc types
- Next message (by thread): m68k reloc types
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Which PIC modifier? It actually seems to work without one. > > So it seems "lea _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_(%pc),%a5" should work as well, > > No, it does not create a GOT. Any got access creates the got and the load should only be created if there are other got accesses. > > Ok, glibc did just answer me that question, it uses it in the startup > > code. Does that mean we could get rid of the separate pic register as soon > > as gcc knows about pc relative addressing? > > 32-bit pc-relative addressing is less efficient than 16-bit pic-register > relative addressing, both in code size and run time. What do you mean? -fPIC creates 32bit offsets and otherwise it makes no difference whether an address register or the pc register is used as base register. bye, Roman
- Previous message (by thread): m68k reloc types
- Next message (by thread): m68k reloc types
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list