[mips patch RFC] removal of gas embedded-pic support code
Richard Sandiford
rsandifo@redhat.com
Wed May 5 20:30:00 GMT 2004
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed May 5 20:30:00 GMT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): [mips patch RFC] removal of gas embedded-pic support code
- Next message (by thread): [mips patch RFC] removal of gas embedded-pic support code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes: >On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:15:55PM -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote: >> I'd say that the mips64-linux-gnu version is the "better" one, since >> the PC-relative 32/64 relocations were non-standard. Agreed. >> But I have no idea how much pain would be caused by switching. Or >> whether (and how much) backward-compatibility needs to be maintained. > > No compatibility needs to be maintained for this, AFAIK. I guess it depends on how much lock-in is acceptable between binutils and gcc. The patch to make mips*-linux-gnu use pc-relative EH entries went in over two years ago (17-Feb-02, it seems). And even the latest gcc release will try to use them. If we remove support entirely, it won't be possible for users to upgrade beyond 2.15 without also upgrading to a newer compiler and recompiling all their old C++ objects. BTW, I think this only gives us a reason to keep R_MIPS_PC32. Has anyone found non-embedded-pic uses of R_MIPS_PC64? Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [mips patch RFC] removal of gas embedded-pic support code
- Next message (by thread): [mips patch RFC] removal of gas embedded-pic support code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list