should 'ld -u sym' cause an error if sym not present?
cgd@broadcom.com
cgd@broadcom.com
Wed May 26 17:46:00 GMT 2004
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed May 26 17:46:00 GMT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): should 'ld -u sym' cause an error if sym not present?
- Next message (by thread): should 'ld -u sym' cause an error if sym not present?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At Wed, 26 May 2004 15:09:14 +0000 (UTC), "Nick Clifton" wrote: > I think that it should - but I am worried that if we change this > behaviour we will break build environments were a whole selection of > undefined symbols are supplied to the linker when only a few of them > are relevant to any particular link. Are there lots of those, where it's done intentionally? There certainly *could* be, but i've only ever done it unintentionally. 8-) I think it's more reasonable to do that with ldscript EXTERN directives than with command line -u's. chris
- Previous message (by thread): should 'ld -u sym' cause an error if sym not present?
- Next message (by thread): should 'ld -u sym' cause an error if sym not present?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list