mn10300: relaxing vs section merging
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Fri May 28 04:30:00 GMT 2004
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri May 28 04:30:00 GMT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): mn10300: relaxing vs section merging
- Next message (by thread): mn10300: relaxing vs section merging
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On May 27, 2004, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote: D >> Of course, the answer was right after the incomplete comment that >> distracted me :-) > I'll run C++ tests. Don't bother. Just did. The problems are fixed. Thanks! -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
- Previous message (by thread): mn10300: relaxing vs section merging
- Next message (by thread): mn10300: relaxing vs section merging
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list