RFC: Add bfd_get_section_ident
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Fri May 28 22:33:00 GMT 2004
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri May 28 22:33:00 GMT 2004
- Previous message (by thread): RFC: Add bfd_get_section_ident
- Next message (by thread): RFC: Add bfd_get_section_ident
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:59:12PM -0400, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes: > > > Here is the start. I can make other changes to make > > > > # objdump -j section > > > > work with multiple sections with the same name. > > bfd_get_section_ident() is a space leak. It should use bfd_alloc(), > not bfd_malloc(). If allocation fails, I think it should return NULL, > not silently return the wrong value. (This is more or less the > conversation we just had a couple of weeks ago.) I can make those changes. > > Now, that said, do we really need two new fields in asection? That > can be pretty costly in the linker, with regard to memory space. > > > +void > > +_bfd_elf_setup_group_pointers (bfd *abfd) > > +{ > > + unsigned int i; > > + unsigned int num_group = elf_tdata (abfd)->num_group; > > + > > + if (num_group == (unsigned) -1) > > + return; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num_group; i++) > > + { > > + Elf_Internal_Shdr *shdr = elf_tdata (abfd)->group_sect_ptr[i]; > > + Elf_Internal_Group *idx = (Elf_Internal_Group *) shdr->contents; > > + unsigned int n_elt = shdr->sh_size / 4; > > + > > + while (--n_elt != 0) > > + (++idx)->shdr->bfd_section->group = shdr->bfd_section; > > + } > > +} > > Is the assignment to n_elt correct in always dividing by 4? Yes. That is in gABI. H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): RFC: Add bfd_get_section_ident
- Next message (by thread): RFC: Add bfd_get_section_ident
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list