[RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Thu Apr 14 01:26:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Apr 14 01:26:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions
- Next message (by thread): [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:20:25PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > DOES it fail then? :) Note that I carefully said "Something like" the example I posted. I know that we had trouble in the past with the assembler pre-processor stripping whitespace completely (see tc_symbol_chars), but it may be that this can't happen now for the mnemonic part of an assembly line. If one of the proponents of this patch analyse app.c behaviour enough to give a reasonable level of confidence, I'll accept the patch. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
- Previous message (by thread): [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions
- Next message (by thread): [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list