[patch] binutils/: Remove the dependency on ancient automake
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@linux-mips.org
Thu Apr 14 17:20:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Apr 14 17:20:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] binutils/: Remove the dependency on ancient automake
- Next message (by thread): [patch] binutils/: Remove the dependency on ancient automake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There's actually a reason why I haven't done binutils and ld yet. They > both use ylwrap; binutils uses it via automake rules, ld may in some > circumstances but usually uses it via explicit rules, and gdb off in > its non-automake corner uses it explicitly. Indeed. > I'm hesitant to move them over separately; the last time I looked at > this I decided the only viable option was to update all three and > import a new ylwrap, all simultaneously. Which is not hard to do, of > course! But I never got around to it. There's that minor complication about binutils and gdb being separate modules... > Can you check out my reasoning here? Did your tests try to regenerate > the lexers/parsers? I did all the above from memory from last year, so > it might easily be bogus. I'll have a look. Maciej
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] binutils/: Remove the dependency on ancient automake
- Next message (by thread): [patch] binutils/: Remove the dependency on ancient automake
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list