[patch] adjust libgloss addresses for 64-bit
Maciej W. Rozycki
macro@linux-mips.org
Mon Apr 18 12:46:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Apr 18 12:46:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] adjust libgloss addresses for 64-bit
- Next message (by thread): [patch] adjust libgloss addresses for 64-bit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Eric Christopher wrote: > (personally I think if we want to load a constant into a register using > a macro we should use li, not la). Absolutely. Sometimes it may be hard to fulfil, though, e.g. the address supplied may be a result of macro expansion at the preprocessing stage and depending on some options it may expand either to a constant or to something else, e.g. a symbol. Making the instruction a part of the expansion may be difficult or at least obscure. And a constant is a valid address after all. ;-) Maciej
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] adjust libgloss addresses for 64-bit
- Next message (by thread): [patch] adjust libgloss addresses for 64-bit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list