RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
David Daney
ddaney@avtrex.com
Wed Feb 2 01:08:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Feb 2 01:08:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
- Next message (by thread): RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Henderson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:23:27PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > >>The .eh_frame section of my libc-2.3.3.so is not terminated with a zero. > > > Known problem. > > >>I am thinking that the proper fix for the problem is to change the >>linker scripts so that a word of 0 is placed at the end of the .eh_frame >>section. > > > Or get glibc fixed. Richard Sandiford already has a patch for it, > but you need to get Uli or Roland or someone to apply it. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2004-11/msg00165.html > Thanks Richard. The patch you pointed me to fixes the glibc problem. However it seems to me that "fixing" ld would be a better solution as any executable or shared object containing an .eh_frame section suffers from the same problem of an unterminated .eh_frame section. Hacking the linker scripts as I mentioned in the original message works as well, but I don't know if it is the best way to do it. Thoughts? David Daney.
- Previous message (by thread): RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
- Next message (by thread): RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list