PIC and libiberty
Ian Lance Taylor
ian@airs.com
Sun Feb 6 10:29:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Feb 6 10:29:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): PIC and libiberty
- Next message (by thread): PIC and libiberty
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> writes: > > Is the problem that there are no PIC object files for libiberty (they > > would be in the object directory libiberty/pic)? Or is the problem > > that they do exist, but that the SID build procedure can't find them? > > Several things suspiciously fail to conspire to produce PIC files in > libiberty: > > - The host makefile fragment for Linux (if there is one at all?) > doesn't set PICFLAG. On x86 Linux PICFLAG is set from config/mh-x86pic, as chosen by libibert/config.table. > - The top-level makefile doesn't propagate its value of PICFLAG to > subconfigures or submakes. This doesn't matter, because nothing other than libiberty uses PICFLAG. Everything else uses libtool. > - libiberty/configure.ac wouldn't do anything with a value for PICFLAG > that was passed to it. configure.ac wouldn't, but libiberty/Makefile.in would. > - Libiberty/Makefile.in doesn't have the @cookie@ in the assignment to > PICFLAG, so it'll never get a non-empty value. Yes, it will, from the config fragments selected by libiberty/config.table. > What I'm getting at is, I don't think there have been any pic files in > libiberty for some time. When I configure with --enable-shared, I see them in libiberty/pic. Ian
- Previous message (by thread): PIC and libiberty
- Next message (by thread): PIC and libiberty
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list