[PATCH] Indicate dependency on personality routines for ARM EHABI
Ian Lance Taylor
ian@airs.com
Wed Feb 9 17:32:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Feb 9 17:32:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] Indicate dependency on personality routines for ARM EHABI
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Indicate dependency on personality routines for ARM EHABI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> writes: > On Wednesday 09 February 2005 16:32, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > More generally, I think it's kind of dubious to use a zero reloc to > > mean anything at all. And why do you need a relocation entry? Why is > > it not sufficient to enter the symbol in the symbol table as an > > undefined symbol? > > Isn't a linker allowed to discard symbols if nothing uses them? An undefined symbol in the symbol table will normally be enough to bring in an object from a static library. > > Is the use of a zero reloc mandated by the ARM ABI? > > Yes. The ABI defines and requires the use of a zero reloc (R_ARM_NONE). Then, this approach is fine in any case. But it should still use BFD_RELOC_NONE, I think. Ian
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] Indicate dependency on personality routines for ARM EHABI
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Indicate dependency on personality routines for ARM EHABI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list