Maciej W. Rozycki macro@mips.com
Fri Feb 11 16:08:00 GMT 2005

• Previous message (by thread): hidden dynamic symbols testcase
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS/ELF: R_MIPS_max is not a real relocation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Hello,

 This should be obvious -- R_MIPS_max is only used for range checking 
and is not a real relocation.  Therefore it should be defined using 
FAKE_RELOC.

 The change should be innocuous, but I've rebuilt the sources and executed 
the testsuite for mips64-linux-gnu, mipsel-linux-gnu and mips64el-elf just 
in case.

2005-02-11  Maciej W. Rozycki  <macro@mips.com>

	* elf/mips.h (R_MIPS_max): Use FAKE_RELOC to define.

 OK to apply?

  Maciej

binutils-2.15.94-20050202-r_mips_max-0
diff -up --recursive --new-file binutils-2.15.94-20050202.macro/include/elf/mips.h binutils-2.15.94-20050202/include/elf/mips.h
--- binutils-2.15.94-20050202.macro/include/elf/mips.h	2004-12-09 06:02:45.000000000 +0000
+++ binutils-2.15.94-20050202/include/elf/mips.h	2005-02-11 14:33:15.000000000 +0000
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ START_RELOC_NUMBERS (elf_mips_reloc_type
   RELOC_NUMBER (R_MIPS_PJUMP, 35)
   RELOC_NUMBER (R_MIPS_RELGOT, 36)
   RELOC_NUMBER (R_MIPS_JALR, 37)
-  RELOC_NUMBER (R_MIPS_max, 38)
+  FAKE_RELOC (R_MIPS_max, 38)
   /* These relocs are used for the mips16.  */
   RELOC_NUMBER (R_MIPS16_26, 100)
   RELOC_NUMBER (R_MIPS16_GPREL, 101)

---

• Previous message (by thread): hidden dynamic symbols testcase
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS/ELF: R_MIPS_max is not a real relocation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list