[RFA:] Trivial test for .gnu.warning.SYMBOL
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hp@bitrange.com
Mon Feb 14 10:38:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Feb 14 10:38:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA:] Trivial test for .gnu.warning.SYMBOL
- Next message (by thread): [RFA:] Fix rarely exercised bug in bfd/aoutx.h find_nearest_line
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > Since you failed to include a target specification where the > > test failed, I had to assume that all such targets had the same > > behavior (e.g. program address map) and pick one and test. > > You simply could have trusted me. Your original message (not the least not quoting log contents or target triple) sounded like you just noticed this on code inspection, as opposed to actual test results. So there was nothing to trust but an assertion that matched up as an invalid assumption (that truncation mattered or always caused error). > +#notarget: "sparc64-*-solaris2*" "sparcv9-*-solaris2*" Quotes not needed. brgds, H-P
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA:] Trivial test for .gnu.warning.SYMBOL
- Next message (by thread): [RFA:] Fix rarely exercised bug in bfd/aoutx.h find_nearest_line
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list