cvs issues with .info files...
Ravi Ramaseshan
ramaseshan.ravi@gmail.com
Mon Jul 4 11:11:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Jul 4 11:11:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): cvs issues with .info files...
- Next message (by thread): cvs issues with .info files...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On 7/4/05, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote: > ----Original Message---- > >From: Mike Frysinger > >Sent: 04 July 2005 11:14 > > > On Monday 04 July 2005 06:08 am, Ravi Ramaseshan wrote: > >> Is there any reason why these info files are generated into the source > >> directory ? Shouldn't they be generated into the build directory > >> instead? Ah... I meant *only* in the build directory and *not* in the source directory but Dave answered my question anyway. Thanks. > > > > they are ... not everyone builds in a diff tree from the source code > > though -mike > > They aren't: they are always generated in the source tree. It's a quirk. > It's handy when preparing a release tarball though, because they need to be > there - they're generated files like the configure scripts and so need to be > in a release so that users can build and install without having all the > infrastructure tools that developers need. See also recent discussions in > the archives. > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00800.html > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-03/msg00227.html > > > cheers, > DaveK > -- > Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... > > Cheers, -- Ravi Ramaseshan http://www.geocities.com/ramaseshan_ravi/ " All man's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a room alone. " - Blaise Pascal
- Previous message (by thread): cvs issues with .info files...
- Next message (by thread): cvs issues with .info files...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list