Carlos O'Donell carlos@systemhalted.org
Tue Jul 5 17:25:00 GMT 2005

• Previous message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
• Next message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 09:24:03AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:13:43AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Can you try
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00767.html
> 
> You may have to adjust it a little bit by hand.

It doesn't solve my issue, though the patch is very usefull, and I would
recommend it get applied.

The provide is not early enough, and hppa isn't taking advantage of the
relaxation pass.

I would have to write a relaxation handler, which is probably a good
idea.

c.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
• Next message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list