OO.o / ld / -Bsymbolic patch ...
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Wed Jul 6 14:21:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Jul 6 14:21:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): OO.o / ld / -Bsymbolic patch ...
- Next message (by thread): OO.o / ld / -Bsymbolic patch ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:46:58PM +0100, michael meeks wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:34 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Note that "protected" visibility is something you almost never want to use. > > It is actually usually slower than not using it at all (involves usually > > two symbol lookups instead of one). > > Yes - I saw some of that in the LD_DEBUG=symbols output - an > interesting behavior; it does eliminate the internal relocations though > - but it's unpleasant from every angle as you say. Is there no > visibility attribute will emulate -Bsymbolic per symbol ? of > default/internal/hidden/protected - protected seemed the only one that > came close. > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-03/msg00087.html H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): OO.o / ld / -Bsymbolic patch ...
- Next message (by thread): OO.o / ld / -Bsymbolic patch ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list