[RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Mon Jul 11 17:47:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Jul 11 17:47:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- Next message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:51:07AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:45:00AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > That was a glibc bug. I posted a patch for the linker bug. > > There may have been a linker bug, but it doesn't solve the problem. > The symbol provide by the linker is still too late for the backend to > do anything about the extra reloc space. Please try the linker patch with the FIXED glibc. H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- Next message (by thread): [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list