RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler...
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Thu Jul 28 20:37:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jul 28 20:37:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler...
- Next message (by thread): RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:48:31PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > I am not sure if this is a GCC problem or a binutils problem. > > I have a a mipsel-linux cross compiler (gcc-3.4.3/binutils-2.16.1) and > whenever I compile even the simplest hello-world.c libgcc_s.so is linked. > > When I do the same thing natively on my i686/FC3, libgcc_s.so is not linked. > > If if explicitly pass -static-libgcc to the cross compiler I do not need > libgcc_s.so (as would be expected). > > As you can see from the transcript below libgcc_s is being linked with > --as-needed. > > Also you can see that neither hello-world.o nor my libc-2.3.3.so have > any undefined symbols that would be satisfied by libgcc_s.so. > > Any ideas about what is going on here? > Does your glibc need libgcc_s.so? Can you try the current binutils? H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler...
- Next message (by thread): RFH: libgcc_s.so being unnecessarily linked for mipsel-linux cross compiler...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list