Nick Clifton nickc@redhat.com
Fri Jun 3 10:04:00 GMT 2005

• Previous message (by thread): `typeinfo for foo' referenced in section `.text' of bar.o: defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTI4foo' of r2.o
• Next message (by thread): Please post patches to the mailing list
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Hi Daniel,

> I for one find it much more convenient if all patches pass through this
> mailing list.  Otherwise, there's no way I'll ever see them, nor many of the
> other developers who read this list.  For instance, there's a bunch of
> unnecessary duplication in the latest bfd/addr2line patch; not necessarily
> worth going back to fix now, but it could have been caught in review.
> 
> What do others think?  Nick, if this is awkward for you, obviously, ignore
> it - you'd be the most affected.

Oh I agree that the patches should go through at least one of the 
mailing lists.

I was under the impression however that all binutils bugzilla updates, 
patches, etc were being forwarded to the bug-binutils@gnu.org list.  Are 
you not subscribed to this list ?

Cheers
   Nick

---

• Previous message (by thread): `typeinfo for foo' referenced in section `.text' of bar.o: defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTI4foo' of r2.o
• Next message (by thread): Please post patches to the mailing list
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list