Please post patches to the mailing list
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Fri Jun 3 13:29:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jun 3 13:29:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): Please post patches to the mailing list
- Next message (by thread): Please post patches to the mailing list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:06:21AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > >I for one find it much more convenient if all patches pass through this > >mailing list. Otherwise, there's no way I'll ever see them, nor many of > >the > >other developers who read this list. For instance, there's a bunch of > >unnecessary duplication in the latest bfd/addr2line patch; not necessarily > >worth going back to fix now, but it could have been caught in review. > > > >What do others think? Nick, if this is awkward for you, obviously, ignore > >it - you'd be the most affected. > > Oh I agree that the patches should go through at least one of the > mailing lists. > > I was under the impression however that all binutils bugzilla updates, > patches, etc were being forwarded to the bug-binutils@gnu.org list. Are > you not subscribed to this list ? I gave up reading bug-binutils before we started using Bugzilla. It looks like the quality of the list has improved somewhat since then :-) Perhaps I'll go back to reading it. I'm still inclined to have all patches go through one list rather than two - take bug-binutils as a parallel to gcc-bugs, and binutils as a parallel to gcc and gcc-patches. But I don't feel half so strongly about it now. So I'll just pick up another list folder. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
- Previous message (by thread): Please post patches to the mailing list
- Next message (by thread): Please post patches to the mailing list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list