[PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again
Eric Christopher
echristo@redhat.com
Thu Jun 9 20:14:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jun 9 20:14:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
FWIW, I agree with Ian and Paul completely on what they've said. This though: > > A final argument against labelling each and every ASE in the opcode > tables, is that you might then argue yourself into saying that the ASEs > also need to be recorded within the ELF header, so that the disassembler > and debugger can decide whether or not to decode those instructions, or > a kernel can decide whether or not to run an executable - but we're > running out of spare bits in there! :-) True, and if we weren't running out of spare bits that's exactly what we'd be doing. The lack of bits is the only reason we've not done that to date. -eric
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list