[Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
Nigel Stephens
nigel@mips.com
Mon Jun 13 21:23:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Jun 13 21:23:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eric Christopher wrote: >>+ case '7': /* four dsp accumulators in bits 11,12 */ >>+ if (s[0] == '$' && s[1] == 'a' && s[2] == 'c' && >>+ s[3] >= '0' && s[3] <= '3') >> >> >> > >Can you change this to be $acc instead of $ac? It'll match with other >targets better. >] > > Eric The MIPS DSP architecture manual uses the $ac syntax, it's also been used by other toolchain companies who have updated their assemblers to support the DSP ASE, and there's now quite a significant amount of DSP assembler code written by various parties which will be using $ac. I'd prefer it if we could stick with $ac but, if you insist, then would supporting both $ac and $acc as aliases be acceptable? Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list