[Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
Eric Christopher
echristo@redhat.com
Tue Jun 14 18:25:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jun 14 18:25:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> A wonderful document is on its way, fairly soon. > :) > Meanwhile (even though you don't care), this does make sense. Many of > the DSP instructions have the form of a multiply-accumulate. These: > For performance you'd like to unroll the matrix-traversing loop and > overlap multiple operations, but you can't do that unless you have > multiple possible destination registers. So instead of one > double-size multiply result register, you now have four. The instructions themselves sound great, my only objection was using the same register that HI/LO used to be. I think that using general purpose registers for this would have been a better solution. -eric
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list