[Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
Nigel Stephens
nigel@mips.com
Tue Jun 14 22:03:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jun 14 22:03:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eric Christopher wrote: >>At the end of the day, you need to know the assembly language of >>the target you're coding for. And from what I've seen of the DSP >>instructions, remembering to call the registers "$acX" is probably >>going to be the least of your worries. ;) >> >> > >Heh. OK. I'll bow to the pressure :) I do wish they'd asked first. > > Hmm. The MIPS architecture is owned and defined and by MIPS Technologies, and although we love the GNU community dearly, we aren't beholden to it - at least as far as the architecture and instruction set definitions are concerned. Indeed we have to maintain toolchain neutrality in light of the fact that we work with a number of compiler vendors, as well as GNU. Just FYI, although the detailed specification of the MIPS DSP ASE is not yet published, there is a short presentation which describes some of its major features. See http://www.mips.com/ProductCatalog/P_DSPASE/content/PressRoom/PressKits/files/dsp_presentation.pdf page 11 onwards. Enjoy! ;-) <http://www.mips.com/content/Products/Architecture/dspase/ProductCatalog/P_DSPASE/productBrief> Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP instructions again]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list