about writing a ld-extension to support linking 16-bit-gas code
Josef Angermeier
sijoange@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
Tue Jun 28 07:29:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jun 28 07:29:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): about writing a ld-extension to support linking 16-bit-gas code
- Next message (by thread): about writing a ld-extension to support linking 16-bit-gas code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> It might be more fun to write a TRUE 8086 binutils port. Binutils has > no problems with 16 bit ports per se, it's just that you're trying to > do 16 bit fixups in a 32 bit port that makes it awkward. a true 8086 port of course would be best but maybe the need for 16-bit code generation isn't such big to get such a project going. So maybe this admittedly awkward solution is the best possible. > I think extending the existing 32-bit i386 linker would be easy, but > logistically complex due to the number of people, projects, and > organizations relying on it. mmm! > Alternately, I did write an OMF linker at one point. > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/16bit/djlink/ You can't produce OMF object files with gcc/gas, right ? - But it might be helpfull, when i try to develop my own little linker or maybe i should extend that one. I'll take a look at that. Thanks josef
- Previous message (by thread): about writing a ld-extension to support linking 16-bit-gas code
- Next message (by thread): about writing a ld-extension to support linking 16-bit-gas code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list