abort in bfd_cache_lookup_worker
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Sun Nov 6 04:43:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Nov 6 04:43:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): [CFT] Detect target tools at configure time, and fix Ada cross-compilation
- Next message (by thread): abort in bfd_cache_lookup_worker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Responding to old mail here...]
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:09:05AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hmm, maybe what we should do is not abort, but issue a descriptive error
> message ("file <foo> can no longer be found") and then exit ? That way
> we do not have to check all potential users of bfd_cache_lookup.
No: BFD is a library. It has long-lived users with UI, not just the
command line binutils tools. For instance, this abort has been
reported a half-dozen times as a GDB bug.
In HEAD now we get an annoyed message and things limp along, which may
be the best we can hope for.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
- Previous message (by thread): [CFT] Detect target tools at configure time, and fix Ada cross-compilation
- Next message (by thread): abort in bfd_cache_lookup_worker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list