PATCH: PR gas/1874: mwait/monitor don't work in 64bit
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Wed Nov 16 17:19:00 GMT 2005
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Nov 16 17:19:00 GMT 2005
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: PR gas/1874: mwait/monitor don't work in 64bit
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: PR gas/1874: mwait/monitor don't work in 64bit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:12:30PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >Are you saying "monitor %eax,%ecx,%edx" should be allowed in 64bit > >mode? Why? How will it be used? > > Just like any other 32-bit addressing in 64-bit mode: probably rarely, > but it should be allowed for whoever is able to find meaningful use for > this. We also don't disallow 16-bit addressing in 32-bit mode, even > though it's unlikely to ever be used... I disagree. In 64bit mode, the correct way to use monitor is load %rax load %edx load %ecx monitor %rax, %edx, %ecx # It is the same as "monitor". It is misleading and confusing to do load %eax load %edx load %ecx monitor %eax, %edx, %ecx Assembler will generate the same opcode for those forms anyway. I don't see why "monitor %eax, %edx, %ecx" has to be allowed in 64bit. H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: PR gas/1874: mwait/monitor don't work in 64bit
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: PR gas/1874: mwait/monitor don't work in 64bit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list