[PATCH] Fix DT_NEEDED search with --as-needed libraries (PR ld/2721)
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Fri Jun 2 07:14:00 GMT 2006
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jun 2 07:14:00 GMT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] Fix DT_NEEDED search with --as-needed libraries (PR ld/2721)
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Fix DT_NEEDED search with --as-needed libraries (PR ld/2721)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If some --as-needed library mentioned on the command line isn't directly > needed by executable being linked, but it is mentioned in DT_NEEDED of some > needed library, then without this patch ld will disregard the library > mentioned on the command line and look for a different one (e.g. in system > paths). According to the current specification of --as-needed, isn't that exactly what ld should do? --as-needed is supposed to cause ld to only link a lib if it satisfies some reference from a regular object (ie. non-dynamic) at that point in the link process. This patch makes --as-needed have another meaning entirely. I'm willing to consider a behaviour change for --as-needed, eg. that references from other dynamic libs cause a lib to be linked, but this particular change seems a little odd. Why should a library that you decide isn't needed be considered again, unless it is also found by the normal search mechanism? -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] Fix DT_NEEDED search with --as-needed libraries (PR ld/2721)
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Fix DT_NEEDED search with --as-needed libraries (PR ld/2721)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list