another ill test?
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Wed Nov 22 03:38:00 GMT 2006
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Nov 22 03:38:00 GMT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): another ill test?
- Next message (by thread): linker operation sequence issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:05:41AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> 21.11.06 00:03 >>> > >On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:38:01AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> I'd > >> therefore like to move Foo into .data, and additionally relax warn2.d to > >> not expect a specific section number. > > > >No, leaving Foo there helps us test that symbols defined in discarded > >sections are handled properly. > > So - just relax the expectation to no longer be a hard 1? That would be OK. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
- Previous message (by thread): another ill test?
- Next message (by thread): linker operation sequence issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list