PATCH: Support LD_SYMBOLIC and LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Thu Jan 25 13:43:00 GMT 2007
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jan 25 13:43:00 GMT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: Support LD_SYMBOLIC and LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: Support LD_SYMBOLIC and LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:58:48AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:48:07PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > > I rebuilt firefox with -Bsymbolic-functions. It significantly reduced > > number of relocations in DSOs and improved firefox load time. This > > patch allows me to apply -Bsymbolic-functions on firefox by just > > setting LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS before compiling it. It will make it > > trivial to rebuild any or all packages with -Bsymbolic-functions and > > improve system performance. > > Just my two cents, but I think this is a horribly bad idea, for the > same reason that there isn't a general $LD_OPTIONS variable (or > $GCC_OPTIONS). It will hurt reproducibility. It is very convenient to use LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS on a per package bassis. You can set it in a Makefile, script or a rpm spec file in the build environment. H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: Support LD_SYMBOLIC and LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: Support LD_SYMBOLIC and LD_SYMBOLIC_FUNCTIONS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list