[patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd
Frank Ch. Eigler
fche@redhat.com
Tue Jan 30 02:57:00 GMT 2007
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jan 30 02:57:00 GMT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): [patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd
- Next message (by thread): [patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> writes: > It is great to see this work being contributed at last. Yes. I had been dreading the submission of this code, since it was so ambitious, and we designed it without outside (upstream) expertise, and thus expected controversy. > One point though - with a new feature like this there really ought > to be some new testsuite entries to check its behaviour. Ideally > they should be generic tests (rather than MeP specific). Is there > any chance of doing this ? If this feature is accepted within binutils, then possibly gas could be extended in a target-neutral way to generate such complex relocations from sufficiently complex expressions. Then a collection of target-independent "label: .word (expression)" source lines could constitute the test case. These could culminate in a linker test that asserts correct evaluation of those expressions, perhaps via "nm". - FChE
- Previous message (by thread): [patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd
- Next message (by thread): [patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list