Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Tue Jan 30 16:34:00 GMT 2007

• Previous message (by thread): [patch] fix superh detection in sim/configure
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Substitute LDFLAGS in toplevel makefile
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Is there any reason not to substitute LDFLAGS in the toplevel makefile?
It is already a standard autoconf substitution.

Andreas.

2007-01-30  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	* Makefile.tpl (LDFLAGS): Substitute it.
	* Makefile.in: Regenerate.

Index: Makefile.tpl
===================================================================
--- Makefile.tpl	(revision 121338)
+++ Makefile.tpl	(working copy)
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ GNATBIND = @GNATBIND@
 GNATMAKE = @GNATMAKE@
 
 CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@
-LDFLAGS = 
+LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
 LIBCFLAGS = $(CFLAGS)
 CXXFLAGS = @CXXFLAGS@
 LIBCXXFLAGS = $(CXXFLAGS) -fno-implicit-templates

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

---

• Previous message (by thread): [patch] fix superh detection in sim/configure
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH] Substitute LDFLAGS in toplevel makefile
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list