Compiler emitting .debug_line versus binutils
Will Newton
will.newton@imgtec.com
Fri Jun 29 14:58:00 GMT 2007
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jun 29 14:58:00 GMT 2007
- Previous message (by thread): Compiler emitting .debug_line versus binutils
- Next message (by thread): Compiler emitting .debug_line versus binutils
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On 29 June 2007 15:35, Will Newton wrote: > > > Hi all, I have a binutils 2.17 port and a gcc 2.95.3 port for an > > embedded DSP type chip. The compiler spits out a > .debug_line section in the > > assembler code like this: .section > .debug_line > > .4byte 0xab .2byte 0x2 .4byte 0x1b > .byte 0x4 > > .byte 0x1 .byte -10 .byte 245 > .byte 10 > > ... This seems to be done by dwarf2out_finish() in > dwarf2out.c inside gcc. > > I assemble the result with gas, which then outputs another > .debug_line > > section in dwarf2_finish() in dwarf2dbg.c. This results in > a rather > > strabge looking .debug_line section in the final executable. > > What's strange-looking about it? That's exactly what > they're supposed to look like. What is strange (to me at least) is that I get two chunks of debug_line data output, so if I do readelf --debug-dump=line I get some valid debug data followed by an empty chunk of debug_line data. Is that expected? e.g. Dump of debug contents of section .debug_line: Length: 171 DWARF Version: 2 Prologue Length: 27 Minimum Instruction Length: 4 Initial value of 'is_stmt': 1 Line Base: -10 Line Range: 245 Opcode Base: 10 (debug line data...) Length: 25 DWARF Version: 2 Prologue Length: 19 Minimum Instruction Length: 1 Initial value of 'is_stmt': 1 Line Base: -5 Line Range: 14 Opcode Base: 13 Opcodes: Opcode 1 has 0 args Opcode 2 has 1 args Opcode 3 has 1 args Opcode 4 has 1 args Opcode 5 has 1 args Opcode 6 has 0 args Opcode 7 has 0 args Opcode 8 has 0 args Opcode 9 has 1 args Opcode 10 has 0 args Opcode 11 has 0 args Opcode 12 has 1 args The Directory Table is empty. The File Name Table is empty. Line Number Statements: - This message is subject to Imagination Technologies' e-mail terms: http://www.imgtec.com/e-mail.htm -
- Previous message (by thread): Compiler emitting .debug_line versus binutils
- Next message (by thread): Compiler emitting .debug_line versus binutils
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list