RFC: Unify overflow checking
David Miller
davem@davemloft.net
Wed Apr 23 07:00:00 GMT 2008
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Apr 23 07:00:00 GMT 2008
- Previous message (by thread): RFC: Unify overflow checking
- Next message (by thread): How can I change ELF_MAXPAGESIZE using ld emulparam/*.sh scripts?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:07:55 -0400 > Does anyone remember why bfd_check_overflow and _bfd_relocate_contents > have different overflow checks? It looks to me as if the ones in > _bfd_relocate_contents are always appropriate, and bfd_check_overflow > is simply stale. This (untested so far) patch unifies them. I think this is definitely something that should go through the testsuite at least most of the ELF backends before being commited. It looks fine to me personally, but I bet it will trigger some obscure regression on some ELF target.
- Previous message (by thread): RFC: Unify overflow checking
- Next message (by thread): How can I change ELF_MAXPAGESIZE using ld emulparam/*.sh scripts?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list