COMMITTED: Add support for STT_IFUNC
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 08:34:00 GMT 2008
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Dec 4 08:34:00 GMT 2008
- Previous message (by thread): COMMITTED: Add support for STT_IFUNC
- Next message (by thread): COMMITTED: Add support for STT_IFUNC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Daniel, >> Plus objdump and readelf will append "()" to relocs which are made >> against STT_IFUNC symbols, as a hint that the relocation invokes a >> function: >> >> RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]: >> OFFSET TYPE VALUE >> 00000009 R_386_32 .rodata >> 0000009f R_386_PC32 ifunction() > > This is ambiguous w.r.t. C++ demangling. Maybe *ifunction? Still, > technically, ambiguous but less likely. Well it is just a visual hint and I am a C coder at heart, so I think that I will things as they are. Cheers Nick
- Previous message (by thread): COMMITTED: Add support for STT_IFUNC
- Next message (by thread): COMMITTED: Add support for STT_IFUNC
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list