bfd_mach_*, old question?
Eric Fisher
joefoxreal@gmail.com
Fri Dec 26 04:46:00 GMT 2008
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Dec 26 04:46:00 GMT 2008
- Previous message (by thread): Add new INSN_* into mips.h
- Next message (by thread): Can LD give warnings about the non-static functions defined but never used explicitly?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I searched in the mailing list of binutils for the bfd_mach_* constants, and found a patch in "Change bfd machine consts to enums" topic (http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00470.html). I guess this is helpful to make porting easy. Why it's not been accepted? IMO, 'enum' is better than '#define'. Eric Fisher Dec. 25 2008
- Previous message (by thread): Add new INSN_* into mips.h
- Next message (by thread): Can LD give warnings about the non-static functions defined but never used explicitly?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list