[patch]: make idata$4 and .idata$5 more compliant to coff spec
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Tue Jan 6 16:29:00 GMT 2009
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jan 6 16:29:00 GMT 2009
- Previous message (by thread): [patch]: make idata$4 and .idata$5 more compliant to coff spec
- Next message (by thread): [patch]: make idata$4 and .idata$5 more compliant to coff spec
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Kai, > Ok, how should I name it? > For dlltool maybe the option --prefixed-import-tables and same for ld? Using the same name for both tools is a good idea. I would suggest a slightly more informative name though. How about --use-nul-prefixed-import-tables ? Cheers Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [patch]: make idata$4 and .idata$5 more compliant to coff spec
- Next message (by thread): [patch]: make idata$4 and .idata$5 more compliant to coff spec
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list