[patch]: Correct interpretation of IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE in coffcode.h
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Fri Jan 16 10:23:00 GMT 2009
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jan 16 10:23:00 GMT 2009
- Previous message (by thread): [patch]: Correct interpretation of IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE in coffcode.h
- Next message (by thread): [patch]: Correct interpretation of IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE in coffcode.h
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Kai,
> Thank you for giving me a hint. I altered the patch, so that it sets
> DEBUGGING for .debug*, .stab*, .comment, and .gnu.linkonce.wi.* sections.
>
> Ok, for apply?
Approved - please apply; except - please could you adjust the wording of
the comment slightly. Instead of:
/* The MS PE spec says, that debug sections are DISCARDABLE,
but the DISCARDABLE flag has not the meaning of being debug.
So just set SEC_DEBUGGING for them. */
please could we have:
/* The MS PE spec says that debug sections are DISCARDABLE,
but the presence of a DISCARDABLE flag does not necessarily
mean that a given section contains debug information. Thus
we only set the SEC_DEBUGGING flag on sections that we
recognise as containing debug information. */
Cheers
Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [patch]: Correct interpretation of IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE in coffcode.h
- Next message (by thread): [patch]: Correct interpretation of IMAGE_SCN_MEM_DISCARDABLE in coffcode.h
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list