archive rebuild with binutils-gold
Matthias Klose
doko@debian.org
Tue Jul 14 18:34:00 GMT 2009
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jul 14 18:34:00 GMT 2009
- Previous message (by thread): Problem regenerating bfd/Makefile.in
- Next message (by thread): Add RPATH/RUNPATH entry
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Forwarding to the binutils ML; I currently won't have the resources to review/summarize the build failures. 2.19.51.20090704 on x86_64 was used for the build. Matthias Lucas Nussbaum schrieb: > Hi, > > I've done a rebuild of unstable with binutils-gold. Clearly, we are not > there yet: 987 packages failed with binutils-gold that didn't fail with > binutils. > > The results are available on > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/07/13-binutils-gold/ > > list_failures gives all the 987 "interesting" packages. The 4th field is > what my script detected to cause the failure. Most (744) are directly > caused by ld failures, but some of them (243) are caused by other > reasons, like strange imake error messages. > > In binutils/ and binutils-gold/, you will find all the logs for those > interesting packages.
- Previous message (by thread): Problem regenerating bfd/Makefile.in
- Next message (by thread): Add RPATH/RUNPATH entry
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list