PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
Jaka Močnik
jaka@xlab.si
Thu Jun 18 10:41:00 GMT 2009
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jun 18 10:41:00 GMT 2009
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
hi, nick, dave! first of all, thanks for the review; appreciate the comments (and eagerly awaiting yours, dave). On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 07:51 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > * You do not appear to have an FSF binutils copyright assignment. > Without such an assignment we cannot accept your contribution. > I have attached a form for you to fill out and email off in order > to start this application process rolling. sure: I expect erich to have the final say in the copyright assignment issues, so he'll comment on this. > * The new files are licensed under version 2 of the GPL. > The binutils sources are now being distributed under version 3 > of the GPL. Do you have any objections to changing the license > on your contributed files to GPLv3 ? not me. once again, it's erich's call. > I suspect some of the problems are due to the fact that the test > harnesses are assuming that a Linux targeted port is also an ELF > based port. Are you really running a COFF based linux using this > toolchain ? well, the linux toolchain is a bit experimental and not really ready for public consumption yet (there is also no publicly available kernel yet), so perhaps it would be best to leave it out of the upstream patch - I can maintain it in a private tree easily. (it really is used to build a variant of a radically trimmed down linux kernel, https://software.sandia.gov/trac/kitten , which we are currently porting to SX and is intended for use in computational clusters, not unlike CNL. and yes, our port really is a COFF based kernel as we dont have an ELF bootloader yet. anyway, it is expected that it will be obsoleted by a future ELF toolchain for Linux on SX.) > If these problems can be resolved then I will be happy to accept your > contribution. sure. I'll check the testsuite status for the *-superux toolchain and fix any outstanding issues. that said, I'll be happy to provide another patch that omits the linux toolchain and fixes any possible SX testsuite issues - as it will be almost identical to this one, I suppose another in-depth review will not be necessary. let's just wait for dave's comments about COFF internals first ... > Would you also be willing to act as a maintainer for the > SX port in order to keep it working as the binutils sources change in > the future ? it's a shrink-wrapped offer: a maintainer comes with the patch. ;) not sure about the name yet, but there will be one, of course. regards, jaKa -- email: jaka@xlab.si w3: http://www.gmajna.net/svojat/jaka/
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
- Next message (by thread): PATCH: support for NEC SX architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list