PATCH: PR ld/6766: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Wed Mar 18 04:01:00 GMT 2009
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Wed Mar 18 04:01:00 GMT 2009
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: PR ld/6766: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 1/2] gold: add incremental input structures definitions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:13:27PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > This patch makes "--entry foo" to imply "-u foo". OK to install? OK. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH: PR ld/6766: Should "--entry foo" imply "-u foo"?
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH 1/2] gold: add incremental input structures definitions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list